Re:The iPad Awkwardly Turns 10
by scarface74 on Tuesday January 28, 2020 @09:33AM
(#22169672)
Why would Microsoft keep developing a product for 7 years if there were no interest?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The iPad Awkwardly Turns 10
by oarsinsync on Tuesday January 28, 2020 @09:48AM
(#22169814)
The Zune was launched in 2006 and discontinued in 2012. Why did that product last 6 years?
I’m not saying Office for iPad is pointless (I use it regularly, so quite the opposite!), but I do think it’s foolish to think an organisation the size of Microsoft’s doesn’t necessarily do things for obvious reasons. Individual incentives do not always lend themselves to data driven objectives.
Re:The iPad Awkwardly Turns 10
by scarface74 on Tuesday January 28, 2020 @09:56AM
(#22169917)
Apple created the iPod in nine months by cobbling together third party components. The Zune wasn’t exactly a billion dollar investment.
Re:The iPad Awkwardly Turns 10
by oarsinsync on Tuesday January 28, 2020 @10:34PM
(#22177079)
I think it's unlikely that Office for iPad is a billion dollar investment either. It doesn't change that it might not actually generate any direct returns for them.
Loss-making strategies can ultimately be profitable in a broader sense (if it increases the stickiness of the product on it's primary platforms, keeping away competitors, a strategic moat).
I don't think there's any evidence either way to be able to make any assumptions about the level of interest of the product, and whether or not that justifies it's existence.