News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:U.S. Gov Privacy Watchdog Under Pressure to Recommend Fac... by TylerE on Monday January 27, 2020 @10:32PM (#22166187)
Not especially - although I also feel that they were unfairly villainized because the cars were still WAY cleaner than stuff built the year before the new emissions laws. I'd also note that subsequently just about every other mfger was caught doing variations of the same thing.

Vehicle testing (emissions, especially, but MPG also) are highly synthetic measurements that aren't very representative of real world conditions.

But to come back to the point at hand - a ban on "facial recognition" is so vague that it doesn't actually accomplish anything - the companies will still do it, they'll just call it something else. "Biometrics", "Posture analysis", "Location monitoring".

Historically, government gets tech wrong, and getting it wrong fast just makes the situation worse.

Re:U.S. Gov Privacy Watchdog Under Pressure to Recommend Fac... by Ididntdothis on Monday January 27, 2020 @10:51PM (#22166287)
I was around when the emissions rules were less strict. If you compare the air back then vs today you see quickly that environmental regulations were a big success. Companies fought them tooth and nail at every step but the rules worked.
Re:U.S. Gov Privacy Watchdog Under Pressure to Recommend Fac... by TylerE on Monday January 27, 2020 @11:05PM (#22166347)
Certainly true, but the regulations VW violated went into force in 2009. We're not talking about the smog era.
Re:U.S. Gov Privacy Watchdog Under Pressure to Recommend Fac... by Ididntdothis on Monday January 27, 2020 @11:51PM (#22166563)
We still have plenty of unnncessary smog. This is not over.