Are you thinking of dollar revenue as an average OR considering suburbian dollar revenue separate? You'd think the suburbia also brings in more cash to the government (I got no sources).
It really doesn't, on a per acre basis.
https://www.strongtowns.org/journal/2018/2/1/the-surprising-...
The discussion was about per-person costs, so per-acre revenues are irrelevant.
I didnt read much judgement in th parent post, but it does imply suburbia is subsidized because it has higher infrastructure cost per dollar of tax revenue. The was a study on that very thing a couple years ago IIRC and they found the most solvent towns and cities are actually the higher density ones even if they are lower income areas.