David Rosenhan’s fraudulent Thud experiment set back psychiatry for decades

Re:David Rosenhan’s fraudulent Thud experiment set back psyc... by chroma on Monday January 27, 2020 @03:56AM (#22157825)

> No, I haven't spent that much time on this subject before to the point of digging up studies.

What? But you said this earlier:

> You can apply all the "autogynephilia" testing and logic to most cis women and they'll come out with a strong diagnosis.

Why did you state that as fact when you had no clue what the academic consensus was? If you’re going to make such assertions, you need to base them on evidence.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:David Rosenhan’s fraudulent Thud experiment set back psyc... by Dylan16807 on Monday January 27, 2020 @05:32AM (#22158161)

God forbid I use wikipedia once in my life. Is that the only part you want to reply to, not the substantive parts?

Let's just use the main study you linked to. It shows biological females scoring 5.07 out of 9 on "core autogynephilia", with a standard deviation of 3.5.

[ Parent | on HN ]