Re:Show HN: Text-to-speech and speech-to-text open-source so...
by ftreml on Sunday January 26, 2020 @06:46PM
(#22155708)
with "performance" i meant the error rate, not the speed. speed was not a criteria for us, so we didnt evaluate it.
i read that deepspeech is way quicker in training phase as it is smarter in using gpu computing power.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Show HN: Text-to-speech and speech-to-text open-source so...
by magicalhippo on Sunday January 26, 2020 @06:55PM
(#22155750)
Ahh gotcha. Yes I got rather poor "hit rate" until I made my own language model.
Fortunately for me I only needed it for command recognition, so the process was quite quick, and results were very good. No need to retrain the net.