News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:More nurturing reading environment may stimulate brain de... by hutzlibu on Friday January 24, 2020 @05:25AM (#22136907)
The obvious difference to me is, that the e-ink screen is not flickering. Every other screen flickers when it gets updated 60+ times a second. They say it is too fast to notice for the eye, but I doubt that. Also a normal screen is an active light source. E-ink is passive.

All in all, I can read for hours on a e-ink display, but my eyes hurt soon on a normal screen. But az least they improved a lot compared from the old bulky ones.

Re:More nurturing reading environment may stimulate brain de... by AlanYx on Friday January 24, 2020 @09:44AM (#22138680)
Contrast ratios likely play into this as well. I ran across some research a while ago that found that a contrast ratio of about 8:1 is ideal for readability. E-ink is pretty close to that optimum (usually around 10-15:1 these days). Whereas for conventional screens contrast ratios keep being pushed higher and higher (1000:1 is pretty typical). While this is great for video, it makes sense that at some point it becomes tiring for the eye when viewing black text on a white background (imagine trying to focus on an object superimposed against the sky on a blindingly bright summer day).
Re:More nurturing reading environment may stimulate brain de... by prox on Friday January 24, 2020 @05:54AM (#22137018)
I was able to get a 120hz screen recently , and the display does seem way more stable and more restful for my eyes