Re:World’s consumption of materials hits record 100bn tonnes...
by njarboe on Wednesday January 22, 2020 @03:59PM
(#22121964)
You are correct. I had 1000000000 as a trillion. Scientific notation is a much better way to calculate things. At 30mm that is a big enough layer that a geologist could see it in the rock record, if it looked different enough.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:World’s consumption of materials hits record 100bn tonnes...
by thfuran on Thursday January 23, 2020 @01:48PM
(#22130430)
I believe that we've spewed enough radiation that no visual distinction would necessary for detection, at least for the next several tens of thousands of years.
Re:World’s consumption of materials hits record 100bn tonnes...
by titzer on Thursday January 23, 2020 @05:21PM
(#22132911)
It's true that atmospheric nuclear testing has produced trace elements that were basically never on Earth before 1945, like Strontium-90 [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strontium-90]. Strontium-90 has a half life of about 29 years, so it will be detectable for a few thousand years or so. Some others last longer.