Re:How housing became the world’s biggest asset class
by majos on Wednesday January 22, 2020 @12:19PM
(#22119615)
I think they're arguing that the real contribution of home ownership is the incentive to regularly invest in an appreciating asset, not the fact that the asset is a house. I don't think they're arguing that the incentive is irrational.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:How housing became the world’s biggest asset class
by marcosdumay on Wednesday January 22, 2020 @01:08PM
(#22120202)
Except that housing is not an asset, it's a fundamental good without with people can barely survive.
Making it appreciate is very problematic.
Re:How housing became the world’s biggest asset class
by chii on Wednesday January 22, 2020 @10:52PM
(#22124677)
> Making it appreciate is very problematic.
nobody is "making it appreciate" - it's a natural consequence of people desiring a home, and the supply not keeping up (whether by physical constraints, or by political/policy constraints).
Re:How housing became the world’s biggest asset class
by intarga on Thursday January 23, 2020 @06:41AM
(#22126738)
> nobody is "making it appreciate"
> political/policy constraints
You just found exactly who is making it appreciate
Re:How housing became the world’s biggest asset class
by wingspar on Wednesday January 22, 2020 @04:17PM
(#22122149)
Is a vacation home an asset?
Re:How housing became the world’s biggest asset class
by marcosdumay on Wednesday January 22, 2020 @04:40PM
(#22122345)
Well, ok, I have taken it a bit too far. Anything you can use or sell is technically an asset, even if it's more expensive to maintain than you would get on a sale (so even boats qualify).
But policy should never treat it as an asset. For policy, it should be a consumable good that only happens to take a very long time to consume.