News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ending Legacy Admissions at Johns Hopkins by xnyan on Saturday January 18, 2020 @08:46PM (#22088780)
That sounds very tidy, but reality is not that simple. Here is a very real situation many schools face: you have 100 slots in your school. You objectively determine that X skills are needed to do well in your school. 1000 applicants demonstrate meeting X level of skills. Some of the 1000 clearly show they have skills well above X, but most of the 1000 are roughly equivalent.

Which 900 get turned away and how do you decide which?

Re:Ending Legacy Admissions at Johns Hopkins by angry_octet on Saturday January 18, 2020 @10:13PM (#22089147)
Is that really so hard? Random selection?
Re:Ending Legacy Admissions at Johns Hopkins by patmorgan23 on Saturday January 18, 2020 @10:53PM (#22089337)
Why is that better than any other method? Why not have legacy factor in after they've met the admissions standards?
Re:Ending Legacy Admissions at Johns Hopkins by stoops on Saturday January 18, 2020 @10:59PM (#22089368)
Why not do it based on their favorite color?
Re:Ending Legacy Admissions at Johns Hopkins by ravar on Saturday January 18, 2020 @11:56PM (#22089554)
If that somehow increases revenue for the institution, why not?
Re:Ending Legacy Admissions at Johns Hopkins by wy35 on Sunday January 19, 2020 @04:23AM (#22090369)
Selecting applicants for the highest revenue is literally discriminating against the poor.
Re:Ending Legacy Admissions at Johns Hopkins by leetcrew on Sunday January 19, 2020 @11:00AM (#22092067)
the obvious question is why does X skills have to remain constant? if you have ten times as many qualified applicants as slots, why not increase the rigor of your program until the decision gets a bit easier?
Re:Ending Legacy Admissions at Johns Hopkins by ponsin on Sunday January 19, 2020 @11:56PM (#22096424)
Because the difference between scoring in the top 94% vs top 97% in the SAT does not correlate well with how good the student will be