News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Parachuting for Charity: A 5-year audit (1999) by goatinaboat on Thursday January 16, 2020 @12:43PM (#22066876)
something they always wanted to' under their own dime

That’s the problem. The sponsors think they are giving a donation to the charity, whereas the charity actually only gets what’s left over after the expensive fun has been had.

When I have done sponsored things I have always covered the costs myself and handed all the sponsors money over.

Re:Parachuting for Charity: A 5-year audit (1999) by arbol on Thursday January 16, 2020 @02:01PM (#22067706)
I've done a sponsored charity parachute jump (static line). I paid for the jump and 100% of the funds raised went to the charity.

I wonder if they actually have enough data for the claims in the abstract. 30 pounds seems abysmally low even by '99 standards.

Re:Parachuting for Charity: A 5-year audit (1999) by CorvusCrypto on Thursday January 23, 2020 @12:24AM (#22125073)
That plus people are incorrectly assuming that it's bad that the charity gets leftovers. That money is still a net positive which they wouldn't have made otherwise as well as an increase in sponsors via the event. The amount of cynicism here is daft.