Re:Researchers find inverse correlation between advertising ...
by bcmo on Wednesday January 15, 2020 @03:45PM
(#22058309)
No one thinks advertising works on them.
That's why it works on them.
Re:Researchers find inverse correlation between advertising ...
by Groxx on Thursday January 16, 2020 @05:51PM
(#22069918)
There's clearly a range of influence though, and it's not crazy to think that some people fall further on one side than others.
Re:Researchers find inverse correlation between advertising ...
by slumdev on Wednesday January 15, 2020 @03:04PM
(#22057893)
What's frightening is that advertising does work on all of us, even when we find it offensive.
I buy warehouse store house-brand laundry detergent, but if you put me on Family Feud and asked me to name a detergent brand, it'd be Tide.
Re:Researchers find inverse correlation between advertising ...
by pascalxus on Wednesday January 15, 2020 @03:11PM
(#22057965)
Name/brand recognition doesn't mean it "worked". In order for it to have worked, you need to actually spend money on the product or cause someone else to spend money on the product.
Re:Researchers find inverse correlation between advertising ...
by tombert on Wednesday January 15, 2020 @03:26PM
(#22058100)
I'm reasonably certain that advertising works on most people, even if they don't realize it. Being told a modified and heavily-biased narrative of the world repeatedly, for literal hours a day is likely to have an effect, even if it's subtle.
Maybe you're one of the lucky people that advertising truly does not work on, and fair enough, but I seriously doubt that these big megacorporations would spend billions of dollars on ads if there weren't some measurable effect on a majority of people.
Advertisment almost never works on me, so it's hard for me to imagine it's so effective on everyone else.