News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Visa, Plaid, networks, and jobs by xur17 on Tuesday January 14, 2020 @05:31PM (#22049915)
My problem is that I'm effectively paying 2-3% in fees on every transaction for this privilege. If there was a way to pay (not cash) that removed this fee, and let me keep the savings, I'd do it for most transactions, even if it removed my ability to charge back transactions.
Re:Visa, Plaid, networks, and jobs by chipotle_coyote on Tuesday January 14, 2020 @05:53PM (#22050094)
My problem is that I'm effectively paying 2-3% in fees on every transaction for this privilege.

If you pay your credit card bill off in full every month, you're not paying anything extra unless the merchant charges a premium for credit card transactions. If you carry a balance, you're paying on that, sure, but nothing requires you to do so.

(Also, of course, you might be actually getting 1% or more back on credit card transactions, if they have cash back programs.)

Re:Visa, Plaid, networks, and jobs by xur17 on Tuesday January 14, 2020 @05:59PM (#22050129)
> If you pay your credit card bill off in full every month, you're not paying anything extra unless the merchant charges a premium for credit card transactions.

The merchant is paying extra, and that cost is hidden in the price I pay.

Re:Visa, Plaid, networks, and jobs by ryanwatkins on Tuesday January 14, 2020 @06:28PM (#22050298)
That hidden cost is subsidized by the other customers charged the same price but that pay cash, or via debit card rather than credit card, or even with a credit card with lower rewards than yours.
Re:Visa, Plaid, networks, and jobs by xur17 on Tuesday January 14, 2020 @06:33PM (#22050335)
As a merchant that accepts credit cards, I can say that the vast majority of the money comes in via credit cards themselves, and costs 3% in fees. It absolutely comes out of the customer's pocket at the end of the day.
Re:Visa, Plaid, networks, and jobs by chipotle_coyote on Tuesday January 14, 2020 @07:41PM (#22050757)
Okay, when you originally you wrote you were effectively paying 2–3% in fees on every transaction for this privilege [the buffer between your actual money and the merchant, quoting the post you were replying to], I took it to implicitly mean every credit card transaction.

If what you really meant is that the cost of the credit card transaction is implicitly in the price everyone is being charged, then sure, I see your point -- except that I think it actually strengthens the original poster's argument for using credit cards! If you pay $25 for a widget in cash and I pay $25 for the same widget on my credit card, then we're literally both paying the same price, but I'm getting the ostensible benefit of using the credit card and you're not. (I would actually argue, unlike the OP, that this is mostly true for debit cards as well, in that you still have a bank fighting to get your money back in a way that isn't true with cash.)

Re:Visa, Plaid, networks, and jobs by rswail on Friday January 17, 2020 @06:02AM (#22073646)
In Australia now, the restriction that Visa/MC used to enforce (same price for cash or CC) has been changed by the Reserve Bank (AU equiv of the Fed) so that surcharges etc are visible. So these days most merchants apply a ~1% surcharge for CC transactions.

We also have an "EFTPOS" network that is independent of Visa/MC. It's a debit account network owned by the banks that give you access to savings or cheque accounts. It's charges are much lower than Visa/MC, so merchants like when you use it and don't apply a surcharge.

Re:Visa, Plaid, networks, and jobs by smileysteve on Tuesday January 14, 2020 @06:41PM (#22050395)
But the top poster clearly demonstrates that there are significant costs in setting up such as system, much less that everybody has on their wallets or phones.

Even cash likely has a higher fee, if not from simple counting mistakes on many small transactions, then complexities like the safe, the risk to employees (insurance), the controller effectively managing the cash each day, the security of a bank truck, and more.