The idea of using "temporary" power to effect the dismantling of structures of power was appealing to Sulla, too. Fortunately for him, he died before seeing Julius Caesar follow his precedent to establish Rome as an empire, and Caesar himself as emperor for life.
History doesn't repeat itself, but it rhymes.
Re:Life at the End of American Empire
by wostusername on Tuesday January 14, 2020 @05:58PM
(#22050122)
This honestly reads as "working as intended" to me. No side can become the tyrant and get everything it wants and screw the other ~50%.
I don’t think the intention was to never solve anything though.
Re:Life at the End of American Empire
by thecolorblue on Thursday January 16, 2020 @09:50AM
(#22064984)
This is really just my opinion, but I think the intention is to solve problems when there is consensus.
seems to me like subcultural-ideology (frankly puerile and overly simplistic) intended to set-up a more robust (still) unrepresented ideology summed up as "just do what the algoritm/computer system tells you to do". i.e. the super-king they want will speak to them through their phones.
Re:Life at the End of American Empire
by Apocryphon on Tuesday January 14, 2020 @06:08PM
(#22050182)
Yeah, this article's attempt to explain the Dark Enlightenment subculture is interesting on its own, and deserves its own post. But I also find the author's description of the current problems of the age (and thus gives rise to these radical movements) compelling. It's the same world that the OP is describing.
Re:Life at the End of American Empire
by Apocryphon on Tuesday January 14, 2020 @06:02PM
(#22050141)
Good luck with that. The system does have the one power to do something- to self-perpetuate in its feckless and corrupt upholding of the status quo. Neither party wants constitutional change that could actually change the system at a fundamental level.
https://ieet.org/index.php/IEET2/more/searle20131202