Re:Building a more private web: A path towards making third ...
by akho on Tuesday January 14, 2020 @01:21PM
(#22047632)
I suggest you pay those people with your money, instead of everyone’s privacy.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Building a more private web: A path towards making third ...
by exitheone on Tuesday January 14, 2020 @01:54PM
(#22048025)
I'm completely fine with paying with my privacy. I feel like the vast majority of users prefers to look at ads compared to paying for content. Which matches reality where most people don't care if their browser blocks cookies or not.
Re:Building a more private web: A path towards making third ...
by summerlight on Tuesday January 14, 2020 @02:40PM
(#22048444)
As long as this patronage gets traction enough to support creators' livelihood. Unfortunately, the majority is not going to spend a single cent on those small creators when their alternatives are high quality contents built upon millions of dollars. It's even proven by Google Contributor program's failure.
Re:Building a more private web: A path towards making third ...
by JohnFen on Tuesday January 14, 2020 @07:05PM
(#22050539)
> It's even proven by Google Contributor program's failure.
Although I think your point is correct, I don't think that this program's failure is evidence for it. I give cash money to numerous small creators, but there's absolutely no way that I would have used the Google Contributer program to do it. That requires more trust in Google than I can muster.
Re:Building a more private web: A path towards making third ...
by summerlight on Wednesday January 15, 2020 @01:58PM
(#22057235)
The point is that this needs to be done at scale. Even with Google's advantage on its pre-established publisher ecosystem, they couldn't make it because most publishers quickly realized that donation was not enough to offset the loss from disabling advertisements.