News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Why I Keep a Research Blog. Parent comment

Re:Why I Keep a Research Blog by Darkphibre on Monday January 13, 2020 @02:10PM (#22037518)
Not op, but one idea: Ask for an articulate reason for downvoting. Increases the barrier of downvotes, and if people don't feel that it's articulate they could then downvote the downvote (with their reasons why).

Frequently downvoted reasons could be added to a blacklist that requires additional elucidation before being able to submit the downvote.

This has been an interesting thought experiment. I'd expect the results might besimilar to Robot9000: https://blog.xkcd.com/2008/01/14/robot9000-and-xkcd-signal-a...

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why I Keep a Research Blog by phantarch on Monday January 13, 2020 @07:45PM (#22040577)
Additionally, you could rephrase from "downvote" to "rebuttal", which I think makes it more clear that not only is the opinion/post unpopular, but that there is information that contradicts the OP's post. It could make for a more substantive phrasing
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why I Keep a Research Blog by vidarh on Tuesday January 14, 2020 @02:24AM (#22042609)
Slashdot has (had? Haven't used Slashdot for years) a reason for up/downvotes, coupled with meta-moderation where you would occasionally be asked to moderate someone elses choice of moderation.

Don't remember how well it worked.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why I Keep a Research Blog by Darkphibre on Wednesday January 15, 2020 @12:29AM (#22051957)
Heck yeah! I had a five digit slashdot account and ICQ accounts. Those were the days. :)
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why I Keep a Research Blog by loceng on Monday January 13, 2020 @03:41PM (#22038338)
If keeping down votes I like the idea of at least a minimum reply character length - those could then be added and act as comments.
[ Parent | on HN ]