I suspect that proportional representation is even more important to establishing a multiparty system that forces cooperation rather than polarization.
Re:A Sick Giant
by ClayShentrup on Thursday January 09, 2020 @01:03PM
(#22003684)
I would say almost the opposite.
http://asitoughttobe.wordpress.com/2010/07/18/score-voting/a...
Re:A Sick Giant
by robbrown451 on Thursday January 09, 2020 @02:25PM
(#22004572)
But that is a much more significant structural change.
And I'm not convinced "multiparty" is what we want. I think we'd be better off if parties had far less significance. Special interest groups? Sure, they'll exist. People who advocate for, say, bigger vs smaller government, more or less military action abroad, antitrust vs laissez faire, etc. But they don't have to nominate individual candidates...that's really only needed when you have a system that has vote splitting.
Re:A Sick Giant
by mistermann on Thursday January 09, 2020 @12:36AM
(#21998810)
That seems like a fine idea to me. How might one actually accomplish it?
Re:A Sick Giant
by ClayShentrup on Thursday January 09, 2020 @01:04PM
(#22003690)
Ballot initiatives.
https://www.vox.com/platform/amp/future-perfect/2018/11/15/1...
As it is, candidates in the middle can't get elected. Two dominant parties is an entirely predictable result of FPTP voting. Approval voting (or ones that tend to elect the Condorcet winner, which also should be the first choice of the median voter) would solve 90% of the problems cited in this article.