Re:The Modern Mind May Be 100k Years Old (2016)
by WalterBright on Tuesday January 07, 2020 @03:53PM
(#21984701)
Zero evidence of things like refined metals or synthetic materials in the geologic record makes the odds of an advanced ancient civilization seem highly improbable.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The Modern Mind May Be 100k Years Old (2016)
by reggieband on Tuesday January 07, 2020 @03:58PM
(#21984768)
Yes, I've heard of refined glass as being one of the indicators. However, pretty advanced technologies like pottery would not have made it.
I can't be sure this [1] is the original article I was remembering but it might be an interesting read anyways. I am sure the study authors approach the subject with far greater care than I could.
1. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/could-an-industri...
Re:The Modern Mind May Be 100k Years Old (2016)
by WalterBright on Tuesday January 07, 2020 @04:23PM
(#21985041)
I don't agree that pottery is "pretty advanced". It's just fire applied to clay.
Concrete, on the other hand, is advanced.
The novel "The Hab Theory" is a good story about the discovery of prehistoric civilizations.