News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Evidence that the key assumption made in discovery of dar... by cjonas on Monday January 06, 2020 @10:48PM (#21976646)
My (limited) understanding is that only space is expanding. Iow there is more space but the space that matter takes up stays constant.

Maybe I'm also confused though

Re:Evidence that the key assumption made in discovery of dar... by simcop2387 on Monday January 06, 2020 @11:09PM (#21976743)
That's basically my lay-person's understanding also. It's because the expansion isn't significant at small scales, so gravity and electromagnetism overpower it. This causes existing objects and clouds to effectively remain the same size [I have to assume that there's an effect, stealing potential energy at very small scales].
Re:Evidence that the key assumption made in discovery of dar... by shpeak on Tuesday January 07, 2020 @01:01PM (#21982610)
Gravity and EM are holding our galaxy, our Laniakea, our Universe. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rENyyRwxpHo .
Re:Evidence that the key assumption made in discovery of dar... by adrianN on Tuesday January 07, 2020 @12:14AM (#21977093)
As I understand it, the forces that keep matter together are strong enough to counteract any expansion.
Re:Evidence that the key assumption made in discovery of dar... by Koshkin on Tuesday January 07, 2020 @07:35AM (#21979341)
Unlikely, because expansion of space is equivalent to the slowing of light, as other commenters have mentioned.
Re:Evidence that the key assumption made in discovery of dar... by cygx on Tuesday January 07, 2020 @07:45AM (#21979405)
Such heuristic explanations are distractions: Locally, gravitational effects (including spatial expansion) manifest as pseudo-forces and hence can be counteracted.