Re:Evidence that the key assumption made in discovery of dar...
by simcop2387 on Monday January 06, 2020 @11:09PM
(#21976743)
That's basically my lay-person's understanding also. It's because the expansion isn't significant at small scales, so gravity and electromagnetism overpower it. This causes existing objects and clouds to effectively remain the same size [I have to assume that there's an effect, stealing potential energy at very small scales].
Re:Evidence that the key assumption made in discovery of dar...
by shpeak on Tuesday January 07, 2020 @01:01PM
(#21982610)
Gravity and EM are holding our galaxy, our Laniakea, our Universe. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rENyyRwxpHo .
Re:Evidence that the key assumption made in discovery of dar...
by adrianN on Tuesday January 07, 2020 @12:14AM
(#21977093)
As I understand it, the forces that keep matter together are strong enough to counteract any expansion.
Re:Evidence that the key assumption made in discovery of dar...
by Koshkin on Tuesday January 07, 2020 @07:35AM
(#21979341)
Unlikely, because expansion of space is equivalent to the slowing of light, as other commenters have mentioned.
Maybe I'm also confused though