News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Manhattan Eruv by seemslegit on Monday January 06, 2020 @02:47PM (#21972463)
If I'm getting the names of the specific doctrines wrong - apologies, but the principle goes to way before they were formally defined.

And yes retroactively - "You bind on earth" is present tense, "will be bound in heaven" is future tense - unless this is a translation artifact there is a clear causal ordering specified here.

Re:The Manhattan Eruv by dragonwriter on Monday January 06, 2020 @04:59PM (#21973877)
> And yes retroactively - "You bind on earth" is present tense, "will be bound in heaven" is future tense

Yes, and it refers not to changing what God wanted in the past (which would be retroactive, but isn't what a present tense action having future tense effects would indicate; it's not “whatever you bind on Earth will have been bound in Heaven”, which would plausibly describe a retroactive effect, or alternatively or pre-ordained one) but the future consequences of sin. Again, the quote you point to is the basis for doctrine about absolution of sin in confession, not the ecclesiastical infallibility either in general or in the specific form of papal infallibility, which are not closely related doctrines.