Marketers are most effective at selling their own industry
Re:New Cambridge Analytica Leaks
by shadowgovt on Monday January 06, 2020 @03:04PM
(#21972673)
If we assume that's true, it would imply marketing works, would it not?
Re:New Cambridge Analytica Leaks
by Intermernet on Monday January 06, 2020 @10:21PM
(#21976501)
It implies that marketing works for marketing. It's possible that those involved in the marketing sector are more vulnerable to marketing. This vulnerability could be the reason that they have faith in the sector's methods, and are therefore employed in the sector.
Many people are marketing averse, and marketing at them will have a negative effect. It just seems that there are enough people around who respond positively to marketing to make it a successful business.
I would dispute this claim, as it has yet to be proven any of the work Cambridge Analytica did was in any way influential or effective. As someone who has worked extensively in data science, including on marketing campaigns, I'm becoming increasingly convinced that the effectiveness of advertising, or at least targeted advertising, is so overstated as to be bordering on snake-oil. Others working in the space agree [0].
[0] https://thecorrespondent.com/100/the-new-dot-com-bubble-is-h...