News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Performance variation in ‘identical’ processors. Parent comment

Re:Performance variation in ‘identical’ processors by ddingus on Sunday January 05, 2020 @07:29PM (#21965399)
Damn. When I trip up on that kind of thing, I always just wonder at how absurd it is.

Two modern miracles. Insane complex and capable tech.

Simple. Hot. Air. Basics.

Oh well, maybe laugh. I would.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Performance variation in ‘identical’ processors by pacaro on Sunday January 05, 2020 @09:37PM (#21965973)
Seymour Cray referred to himself as an "overpaid plumber" for good reason. Heat management has been a critical element of high performance computing for a long time
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Performance variation in ‘identical’ processors by tonyarkles on Sunday January 05, 2020 @11:31PM (#21966467)
If I recall, one iteration of their products sprayed a shower of cooled liquid Fluorinert[1] directly into the processor cards, with no heatsinks at all. [2]

[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluorinert [2] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cray-2

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Performance variation in ‘identical’ processors by Baeocystin on Monday January 06, 2020 @04:43PM (#21973696)
It was fully immersed! The Fluorinert was circulated through the stacked cards, then re-chilled with a cold water heat exchanger.
[ Parent | on HN ]