Re:Including Illegal Activity in the U.S. National Economic ...
by peterwwillis on Saturday January 04, 2020 @11:01PM
(#21959552)
Going from "we don't use as much coke as in the 80's" to "the war on drugs worked" is a bit like going from "we have less teen pregnancy now than in the 90s" to "abstinence worked". It's not only ignoring a very large number of alternate factors, but it's assuming the latter is a successful strategy, when all of the evidence points to the contrary.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Including Illegal Activity in the U.S. National Economic ...
by eanzenberg on Sunday January 05, 2020 @12:20AM
(#21959808)
Interesting you bring up abstinence because kids are having way less sex nowadays than in the past.
Re:Including Illegal Activity in the U.S. National Economic ...
by kingkawn on Sunday January 05, 2020 @01:02AM
(#21959955)
Most definitely not because of abstinence education
Re:Including Illegal Activity in the U.S. National Economic ...
by unishark on Sunday January 05, 2020 @01:37AM
(#21960050)
Because proving causation is always difficult if not impossible? Or because in both cases we have a personal bias that makes us not want those programs to have worked, despite not being able to disprove causation either?
Re:Including Illegal Activity in the U.S. National Economic ...
by eivarv on Sunday January 05, 2020 @07:23AM
(#21960970)
Because in neither case has anyone actually even made a coherent argument for a causal effect that doesn't ignore all the other factors?
Besides, when "all the evidence points to the contrary" is usually a bad sign...
There are a lot of things you aren't able to disprove that are (probably) not true.
Re:Including Illegal Activity in the U.S. National Economic ...
by caublestone on Sunday January 05, 2020 @12:52AM
(#21959912)