News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Getting a 787 back in the air after a diversion by jacquesm on Saturday January 04, 2020 @01:18AM (#21953248)
Usually done for big rigs, diesels not gas engines.
Re:Getting a 787 back in the air after a diversion by WalterBright on Saturday January 04, 2020 @01:47AM (#21953334)
Airplane engines are gas!
Re:Getting a 787 back in the air after a diversion by jacquesm on Saturday January 04, 2020 @02:00AM (#21953390)
I didn't have airplane engines in mind when I wrote that (tanks = vehicles) but given the thread context and your airplanes reference I see how that could happen, same thing with 'block heaters' elsewhere in the thread, I take it that is in the context of other vehicles (heavy equipment, tractor-trailers, buses and so on).

And yes, some airplane engines use gas but the majority of them runs something that in constituency is closer to regular diesel than to gas.

Kersone is #1 diesel!

AV gas is another matter entirely but I'm not aware of any jet that would use it, though that might be a fun thing, and given that turbines can run on almost anything combustible it will probably work to some extent but I don't think it will be a happy ending unless the engine is really designed for it.

Btw, this is an interesting start-up: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ESdHyNtHpqs not cold weather but I'd hate to fly that in any conditions.

Re:Getting a 787 back in the air after a diversion by WalterBright on Saturday January 04, 2020 @02:08AM (#21953417)
Being WW2, these were piston engines running avgas.
Re:Getting a 787 back in the air after a diversion by ethbro on Saturday January 04, 2020 @03:10PM (#21957127)
I guess the sole redeeming thermodynamic property of the operation would be that most seals would expand as they heated?

Still, I imagine that was a "light fire, move away" procedure!

Re:Getting a 787 back in the air after a diversion by jacquesm on Sunday January 05, 2020 @06:32PM (#21965044)
The bigger reason is to make the oil fluid again!
Re:Getting a 787 back in the air after a diversion by inferiorhuman on Saturday January 04, 2020 @02:44AM (#21953542)
Airplane engines are gas!

Sure, small ones with piston engines. Sure. Most anything running a turbine uses Jet-A which is closer to kerosene / diesel than gasoline.

If you're leaking fuel you've got bigger problems than how to safely heat up the engine.

Re:Getting a 787 back in the air after a diversion by dredmorbius on Saturday January 04, 2020 @03:16AM (#21953638)
Jet aircraft were little-used during WWII.

(There were some, late in the war, but only just. Otherwise, all aircraft were piston-driven, running avgas, a/k/a petrol / gasoline.)

Re:Getting a 787 back in the air after a diversion by dehrmann on Saturday January 04, 2020 @12:44PM (#21956197)
Modern prop planes tend to use high-octane gas. Jets use jet fuel (kerosene), which is really a light diesel.