News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Oslo had 0 pedestrian, 0 cyclist, 0 children and 1 driver... by _-david-_ on Thursday January 02, 2020 @11:37AM (#21936843)
>Still not sure why they don't have more pedestrian catwalks in cities directly above the roads.

I assume it would cost more in building and maintenance costs than sidewalks.

Re:Oslo had 0 pedestrian, 0 cyclist, 0 children and 1 driver... by bluGill on Thursday January 02, 2020 @12:34PM (#21937524)
If there is a large network building owners will happily install and maintain them. In some places the expensive store fronts are on the second floor where all the people are: they take those cat walks from building to building without putting a coat on.
Re:Oslo had 0 pedestrian, 0 cyclist, 0 children and 1 driver... by _-david-_ on Thursday January 02, 2020 @09:44PM (#21942587)
Maybe in some areas it may work but for most cities and many places in those cities it just won't work.
Re:Oslo had 0 pedestrian, 0 cyclist, 0 children and 1 driver... by bluGill on Friday January 03, 2020 @08:50AM (#21945779)
Like any system you need a critical mass of infrastructure before it takes off. Is it worth it for your situation is always a valid question.