News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Oslo had 0 pedestrian, 0 cyclist, 0 children and 1 driver... by bluGill on Thursday January 02, 2020 @10:09AM (#21935907)
Public transit is only faster than cars when they have an "unfair" advantage. I'm guessing (I haven't been there) by London zone 1-2 you means trips where the subway (tube you call it?) gets transit out of the way. Other useful "unfair" advantage are trains - because they cannot stop - preempt traffic, and there are also transit only lanes where cars are not allowed. Anytime transit doesn't get some advantage over traffic it is slower because it has the same traffic plus the additional non-traffic stops it needs to make. For long distance trips transit is often faster.

The unfair advantage is not cost effective to grant to all cars, but still need to be acknowledged.

Re:Oslo had 0 pedestrian, 0 cyclist, 0 children and 1 driver... by SECProto on Thursday January 02, 2020 @10:36AM (#21936213)
In a city where the availability of land is a major limiting factor, you could argue that cars are the ones getting an "unfair advantage" - 8 square meters of city surface permanently dedicated to moving oneself around is clearly an inequitable use of space.
Re:Oslo had 0 pedestrian, 0 cyclist, 0 children and 1 driver... by bluGill on Thursday January 02, 2020 @01:36PM (#21938211)
One of several reasons I put unfair in quotes.