We already know neutrinos can travel through most mass, so modulating those would let you transmit through the Earth and Sun with lower latency and without a repeater constellation routing around the object.
Whatever aliens might be using to transmit information is likely more advanced than we're able to detect.
But a simpler explanation that has many more paths to being true is "there's nothing out there."
To be clear, I don't think the evidence suggests near-certainty here. I wouldn't say that there's a 99% chance that we're alone in the galaxy. But it's also not a wide open field. There is some evidence, and so far that evidence suggests that we're likely alone.
Alien life forms wouldn't need to use technology to make themselves harder to detect. It's extremely difficult by default.
They would need to use technology to deliberately spread a message in a way that is at all likely to be detectable, and even then would still have to get quite lucky.
So, question: how strong does an undirected, random signal need to be to be reasonably detected at 10 light years away?