I think they're probably aware of the general technical issues/limitations/possibilities these days.

It's more political than technical. It matters a lot who is telling the same truth, e.g. for the minutiae of a formal meeting.

To clarify: No, I'm not willing to become a "whistleblower" for simply following a long-time law in a stable western-european country. I chose to trust the existing legal systems in this case.

And to clarify: I actually do trust the legal systems, in this unnamed country.

Whistleblowing implies something is wrong... Let me change the angle: Do you believe it is important for democracy to have solid information to base votes on? Would you be legally able to share this information if you wanted to?

That isnt what the parent comment asked though.