News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Publishers Determined to Kill E-Books by emodendroket on Sunday December 29, 2019 @11:09AM (#21906572)
But is it necessary for ebooks to succeed? You can't resell a digital movie, video game, or song you bought either.
Re:Publishers Determined to Kill E-Books by mastax on Sunday December 29, 2019 @12:32PM (#21907142)
Re:Publishers Determined to Kill E-Books by ethbro on Sunday December 29, 2019 @11:29AM (#21906707)
It'd be interesting to have a resale tax for used goods, on top of any negotiated price, that followed royalty payments for a new digital good.

As is, we're essentially artificially creating disposable goods, for the primary purpose of enriching distributors at a cost to consumers.

Re:Publishers Determined to Kill E-Books by snuxoll on Sunday December 29, 2019 @01:00PM (#21907318)
I think restoring copyright to sane periods is a better solution, resale of digital goods requires online DRM systems to continue functioning indefinitely and we’ve seen the issues that causes.

I would be less annoyed by essentially consumable digital goods if I knew sometime down the road they would enter the public domain in a reasonable timeframe, and not well after the eventual death of the current generation of children.

Re:Publishers Determined to Kill E-Books by jjeaff on Sunday December 29, 2019 @07:48PM (#21909820)
I shudder to say this, but that might actually be a use case for blockchain. A shared distributed ledger that an ebook reader consults before opening an ebook.
Re:Publishers Determined to Kill E-Books by est31 on Sunday December 29, 2019 @09:25PM (#21910270)
Yeah the "don't let people sell used books twice" problem maps pretty well to the "prevent double spend" problem that blockchains (try to) solve.