Re:Target=“_blank” – the most underestimated vulnerability ever
by SigmundA on Tuesday December 24, 2019 @08:58AM
(#21872072)
Actually surprised this is possible in crossdomain. Almost everything else through is locked down otherwise.
Anyone know why this isn't considered a bug and fixed? What is a legit use of a window changing it opener location crossdomain? I get it in the same web site / app.
Re:Target=“_blank” – the most underestimated vulnerability ever
by combatentropy on Tuesday December 24, 2019 @06:00PM
(#21875518)
> The page we're linking to gains partial access to the linking page via the window.opener object. The newly opened tab can then change the window.opener.location
Re:Target=“_blank” – the most underestimated vulnerability ever
by rasz on Tuesday December 24, 2019 @06:27PM
(#21875631)
There might be some legacy code using this, but privacy conscious browsers (so not Chrome, but maybe Vivaldi?) should have a section dedicated to turning off stupid shit like this. Opera used to have plethora of options where you could disable user hostile tricks like blocking right click menu etc. Things you could customize (down to per website granularity):
Allow resizing of windows
Allow moving of windows
Allow raising of windows
Allow lowering of windows
Allow changing of status field
Allow scripts to detect context menu events
Allow script to hide address bar
Enable frames
Enable inline frames
Send referrer information
+ability to disable/set detailed quota/readonly for HTML5 local storage/cookies
Modern browser should probably throw in ability to disable/block AudioContext/ navigator.mediaDevices/ navigator.getUserMedia/ HTMLCanvasElement.prototype.toDataURL/ HTMLCanvasElement.prototype.toBlob/ CanvasRenderingContext2D.prototype.getImageData/ WebRTC/ navigator.sendBeacon/ window.opener
Re:Target=“_blank” – the most underestimated vulnerability ever
by zamadatix on Monday December 23, 2019 @10:13PM
(#21869560)
Firefox was mentioned in the article, Safari isn't that interested in furthering the web, and Microsoft has thrown in the towel and skinned Chromium as many others. Not sure who else would have commented/been mentioned.
Re:Target=“_blank” – the most underestimated vulnerability ever
by rs23296008n1 on Tuesday December 24, 2019 @06:50PM
(#21875721)
I think aspects of this should be fixed in the standards. Firefox should definitely fix it. Make it readonly or even non-readable by default when the child domain is different to parent. Have the parent decide.
Security issues need secure solutions, right?
I don't actually see the utility in allowing open access from child page to parent page, especially when cross-server is a factor. There are similar other issues that have been closed. Why not this one?
https://mathiasbynens.github.io/rel-noopener/
Anyone know why this isn't considered a bug and fixed? What is a legit use of a window changing it opener location crossdomain? I get it in the same web site / app.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15685324
Dear browsers, please just remove this feature.
Allow resizing of windows
Allow moving of windows
Allow raising of windows
Allow lowering of windows
Allow changing of status field
Allow scripts to detect context menu events
Allow script to hide address bar
Enable frames
Enable inline frames
Send referrer information
+ability to disable/set detailed quota/readonly for HTML5 local storage/cookies
Modern browser should probably throw in ability to disable/block AudioContext/ navigator.mediaDevices/ navigator.getUserMedia/ HTMLCanvasElement.prototype.toDataURL/ HTMLCanvasElement.prototype.toBlob/ CanvasRenderingContext2D.prototype.getImageData/ WebRTC/ navigator.sendBeacon/ window.opener
I'm surprised it can't be addressed. Is being able to modify the referrer location that difficult to lock in various ways?
On macOS 10.15.2 (19C57) using Safari 13.0.4 (15608.4.9.1.3), the proofs of concept mentioned in the article yield
> The previous tab is safe and intact. window.opener was null; mischief not managed!
Perhaps your dismissal of Safari is presumptive and mistaken.
Security issues need secure solutions, right?
I don't actually see the utility in allowing open access from child page to parent page, especially when cross-server is a factor. There are similar other issues that have been closed. Why not this one?