Your answer seems confused as anything. The problem domain is ethical action.

Getting into heaven or hell are why the problem domain is salient, but not the problem domain.

I didn’t say Christianity is applied to previous christianities. I said it was applied to the belief systems that existed before - I.e. the various paganisms.

This is well researched historical fact. You are the one making an error here because you are getting confused about the naming.

I’m not talking about sects. I’m talking about Christianity being applied to the belief systems that existed before in the various places where it spread.

You then go on to simply state that Christianity is not a framework.

Affirming the consequent isn’t an argument. We already know that you think this.

The rest of your statements just rely on made up stuff.

There is no such thing as ‘an implementation of Buddhism’. There is no such concept in comparative studies of religion.

You are just using that terminology to make it sound like it can be compared to the programming concept of a framework.

It’s pretty absurd to suggest Buddhism works like Ruby on Rails. Rails doesn’t incorporate beliefs and customs. Nobody believes in rails.

It’s a completely different class of entity, so at best it is a vague analog.

As such Christianity is just as much a framework as Buddhism is.