Re:Alienated, Alone and Angry: What the Digital Revolution Did?
by papeda on Friday December 20, 2019 @11:34AM
(#21845339)
Yes, but this is fear of crime. Over the past few decades, in general more Americans have believed crime is increasing than decreasing [1].
Re:Alienated, Alone and Angry: What the Digital Revolution Did?
by LMYahooTFY on Friday December 20, 2019 @12:09PM
(#21845623)
I only went halfway down the page, but haven't yet stumbled upon the trend you're referring to?
The first few questions specifically asking about the topic show the opposite of what you claim.
Re:Alienated, Alone and Angry: What the Digital Revolution Did?
by majos on Friday December 20, 2019 @02:54PM
(#21846894)
The section I’m referring to is “Is there more crime in the U.S. than there was a year ago, or less?”.
Re:Alienated, Alone and Angry: What the Digital Revolution Did?
by philipkglass on Friday December 20, 2019 @03:08PM
(#21846993)
Very interesting. The big swings in opinion don't seem timed to line up with national violent crime statistics. Maybe they correlate better with economic boom times and recessions. Or maybe perceptions are more weighted toward property crimes that have less reliable national statistics. Look at that dizzying drop in "more crime" responses between 1997 and 1998. The "more crime" responses stay low until 2002.
Or maybe there's just a lot of noise in the responses. "More crime" gained 10 points between 2004 and 2005.
Re:Alienated, Alone and Angry: What the Digital Revolution Did?
by wostusername on Friday December 20, 2019 @11:37AM
(#21845364)
Yes, but if you watch the news that fact is never reported. Instead you get story after story of robbery, murder, assault ...etc.
TV news stations care about ratings, papers care about circulation. Fear stories keep people watching/reading.
Re:Alienated, Alone and Angry: What the Digital Revolution Did?
by JohnFen on Friday December 20, 2019 @12:11PM
(#21845639)
However, this has been true for as long as news reporting has existed, but the level of paranoia and isolation in society has not always been as high as it is now (although there have been similar periods in the past).
I don't think that the nature of media reporting, while likely a factor, is a sufficient explanation.
Re:Alienated, Alone and Angry: What the Digital Revolution Did?
by bilbo0s on Friday December 20, 2019 @12:34PM
(#21845820)
There's also social media though, which amplifies everything for people who believe what they consume through those channels.
Re:Alienated, Alone and Angry: What the Digital Revolution Did?
by buboard on Friday December 20, 2019 @02:02PM
(#21846566)
They would claim that all the paranoia, helicopter parenting, incarceration, worked to reduce crime
Re:Alienated, Alone and Angry: What the Digital Revolution Did?
by JohnFen on Friday December 20, 2019 @02:16PM
(#21846659)
They can claim it, but all the objective evidence says they're wrong.
Re:Alienated, Alone and Angry: What the Digital Revolution Did?
by jascii on Friday December 20, 2019 @11:36AM
(#21845353)
There is not necessarily a direct relationship between the spread of crime and the spread of fear of crime. I see this as being related to the difference between risk and perceived risk.
Re:Alienated, Alone and Angry: What the Digital Revolution Did?
by jdkee on Friday December 20, 2019 @01:03PM
(#21846061)
Yes and the increased perception of crime is likely due to the US becoming a lower trust society than it previously was.
Re:Alienated, Alone and Angry: What the Digital Revolution Did?
by bilbo0s on Friday December 20, 2019 @11:43AM
(#21845411)
Well, I mean, the poster did mention:
>poisonous oligarch funded divisive politics
That is probably a large part of the reason people believe in the widespread crime myth.
Re:Alienated, Alone and Angry: What the Digital Revolution Did?
by scottlocklin on Friday December 20, 2019 @03:06PM
(#21846975)
Thats why I used the words "fear of crime." Mostly due to clickbait journalism and media lionizing of (alienated) whackjob mass murderers.
But crime, particularly violent crime, is at or near historic lows.