Risk mitigation. Your CEO is probably juggling several issues from budget, hiring, sales, real estate etc. Some of these are probably high risk decisions that could sink the company. So the decision to go with AWS and not care about marginal cost savings are about eliminating a potential source of risk.
Re:The Amazon Premium
by spookthesunset on Thursday December 19, 2019 @03:11PM
(#21838742)
Dude, even for a small company the difference between $1000/mo and $250/mo is peanuts.
Maybe. But the decision heuristic here, which is "we pay 4x more for things because the CEO doesn't trust his people and like to micromanage things" can easily be fatal.
Re:The Amazon Premium
by spookthesunset on Thursday December 19, 2019 @09:30PM
(#21841298)
The company paid $1 instead of a quarter. Why the original poster even put up a fight about saving 750 dollars.... can't tell you. They probably spent more on keeping the kitchen stocked with coffee and soda each month.
The company is paying an extra $9000/year. With a boss like this, it's perfectly possible that they don't stock the kitchen with coffee and soda, because the CEO is already having somebody bring him his caramel macchiatos, so he doesn't care, and money's tight, because his people just do what the boss says instead of him trusting them to do the right thing.
And thus is why one small company dumps $1,000 a month into AWS when it could dump about $250 a month into Digital Ocean for comparable results. I know these are small numbers for many people on here, but it is a good illustration.
For what its worth. I was able to justify getting an AWS Certification because of this, which has been surprisingly helpful to have on my resume, even with companies that don't use AWS. It seems to be a fairly respected certification that demonstrates knowledge of cloud computing in general.