Re:Synchronous Messaging at Mozilla: The Decision
by gsnedders on Thursday December 19, 2019 @11:18AM
(#21836225)
(Also, Rust isn't under MoCo, it's under MoFo directly.)
Re:Synchronous Messaging at Mozilla: The Decision
by pcwalton on Thursday December 19, 2019 @11:29AM
(#21836339)
Rust isn't "under" either. The core team, who are ultimately in charge, don't report to anybody in the Mozilla organization.
Re:Synchronous Messaging at Mozilla: The Decision
by est31 on Thursday December 19, 2019 @11:41AM
(#21836461)
In which way? I've thought the Rust engineers were employees of the Mozilla corporation? And the Rust trademark seems to be owned by the Mozilla corporation as well: https://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=87796977&caseSearchType=U...
Re:Synchronous Messaging at Mozilla: The Decision
by steveklabnik on Thursday December 19, 2019 @11:51AM
(#21836598)
All Mozilla employees working on Rust are under Moco, not Mofo, that's correct. Unless something extremely drastic that nobody has talked about has happened in the last year.
Almost all of Mozilla is under Moco.
Re:Synchronous Messaging at Mozilla: The Decision
by dzypa on Thursday December 19, 2019 @11:20AM
(#21836253)
Yes, if you are getting paid by someone you should do what they ask of you, especially when it's something sensible.
Re:Synchronous Messaging at Mozilla: The Decision
by icebraining on Thursday December 19, 2019 @11:25AM
(#21836310)
Most Rust contributors are not Mozilla employees. Even in the core team, 3 of 9 members weren't (as of 2017, may be different today),
Re:Synchronous Messaging at Mozilla: The Decision
by steveklabnik on Thursday December 19, 2019 @11:50AM
(#21836585)
It is 3 of 9 today as well. (In 2017 it was higher!)
Re:Synchronous Messaging at Mozilla: The Decision
by StavrosK on Thursday December 19, 2019 @11:26AM
(#21836313)
So if I give you a dollar you'll stop commenting?
Re:Synchronous Messaging at Mozilla: The Decision
by dsypa on Thursday December 19, 2019 @11:30AM
(#21836356)
If you were paying me to comment and you wanted me to stop commenting, yes definitely.
I could go my own way and comment for free (as I already do) and then I would be able to do whatever I wanted.
But as long as I am funded by you, yes I should do what you ask of me.
Re:Synchronous Messaging at Mozilla: The Decision
by StavrosK on Thursday December 19, 2019 @11:36AM
(#21836411)
Wouldn't you have a choice between continuing to get paid or continuing to comment? And what if I already knew your decision would be to stop getting paid and quit HN but I still needed you to continue being on HN because your presence here was valuable to me? Would that not mean that I'm paying you, but I can't force you to do anything without harming myself much more than you?
Re:Synchronous Messaging at Mozilla: The Decision
by orthecreedence on Thursday December 19, 2019 @05:00PM
(#21839743)
Haven't you heard? Nuance isn't a thing anymore. All decisions are binary. Get with the times.
Do you see the problem with that line of thinking or do I have to explain further?