Re:Samsung chair imprisoned and 24 others found guilty in un...
by jussij on Wednesday December 18, 2019 @07:15PM
(#21830860)
With a list of offences that long, the sentence does seem to sit on the side of leniency.
A 1.5 year sentence probably means that with some good behavior, the sentence will have be served in less than a year.
* gathering personal information on some union members, such as their marital status, personal finances, and mental-health histories.
* threatening to cut the wages of employees linked to unions
* withdraw business from subcontractors who appeared union-friendly
* clos[ed] sub-contracted firms with active unions
* used "sensitive information about union members to convince them to leave"