Re:Google Brass Set 2023 as Deadline to Beat Amazon, Microso...
by scarface74 on Tuesday December 17, 2019 @06:11PM
(#21819993)
Most major decisions aren’t made by what is cheaper - it’s made by which is safer.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Google Brass Set 2023 as Deadline to Beat Amazon, Microso...
by faizshah on Tuesday December 17, 2019 @06:16PM
(#21820042)
Making operations google’s problem is precisely what drives BigQuery, FaaS and Dataflow adoption. Its operationally safer when you dont need a hadoop team to maintain your data infrastructure.
See Nytimes, Twitter and Spotify for examples.
Now if you’re talking about future-safety there was an argument...until a few hours ago.
Re:Google Brass Set 2023 as Deadline to Beat Amazon, Microso...
by scarface74 on Tuesday December 17, 2019 @06:30PM
(#21820183)
Again, you’re talking about what’s “operationally safer” not what’s “reputationally safer”. If AWS goes down, no one is going to question your decision - and you’re in the same boat as a lot of other people. If GCP goes down and everyone else is up, people are going to ask a million question.
Every company you named isn’t the same thing as just arguing to the powers that be - AWS is what Netflix uses. AWS has many more “referencable clients” that matter.