Re:Aerial footage of uncontacted Amazon tribe
by nitrogen on Friday February 04, 2011 @07:31PM
(#2181992)
There are much less invasive options for contact than colonialism. Nobody said we have to move ourselves into some indigenous peoples' lands in order to offer them the chance to accept or reject a modern life.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Aerial footage of uncontacted Amazon tribe
by lwhi on Friday February 04, 2011 @08:01PM
(#2182060)
But the effect is the same - their society would be absorbed, and probably forgotten.
It's like time travel - you can't go back because you don't know what kind of effects you'll have on the future. In this case you don't know what kind of effects contact will have on their (the tribe's) future.
Re:Aerial footage of uncontacted Amazon tribe
by kiiski on Saturday February 05, 2011 @05:51AM
(#2182886)
So how about Japan for example? Do you think contact with the west was bad for them?
Re:Aerial footage of uncontacted Amazon tribe
by soapdog on Saturday February 05, 2011 @06:30AM
(#2182915)
you're comparing different things, or do you think that a highly advanced CIVILIZATION like the japanese encountering the west is similar to a TRIBE of HUNTERS-GATHERERS.... damn!
Re:Aerial footage of uncontacted Amazon tribe
by kiiski on Saturday February 05, 2011 @07:14AM
(#2182947)
No. I was referring to messages by lwhi and nitrogen. As nitrogen said, there are less invasive options to contact them than colonization and there are cases where it is beneficial to the (in some ways) less advanced civilization. It might not have been fun for the japanese when the westerners first came there, but in the long run it was a good thing. And while the japanese culture was certainly changed, it was not destroyed or forgotten.