So I'd need two bikes, one with specialized winter tires, that I'm replacing frequently when they get stolen.
Another gym membership to shower at before I go to work.
Better health insurance to lessen the financial blow of the inevitable hit and run.
More time to account for the longer commute. In my case it's 4-6x longer to bike than drive. Time I'm not making any money and time I'm at substantially greater risk of getting seriously injured.
The politics of it certainly do suck. There's too much money pushing for the jobs that our car dependence create.
Your attribution of choice in this matter is absurd. Maybe you're so lucky and wealthy that you can choose for whom you will work, where/when that work occurs, and how you'll get to work. That's an exceptionally privileged position and you should check your privilege before making such inane assumptive, and accusatory comments as this one.
As I said, it was possible 100 years ago. We -as a society- have brought this rut on ourselves.
Here's a thought.
Educated people can simultaneously be impoverished and current on world affairs.
In theory, it should be easy to solve transport within a metro area with low-carbon solutions such as walking, bicycling and public transport.
I'm continually amazed by how good public transport and walkability are in some cities outside America. Bicycles also have amazing potential and a few successes in the world as mass transit.
It seems the issue is not with engineering a solution, but with the politics of what gets implemented through our politicians and bureaucrats.