Re:United States to fund gun-violence research after 20-year...
by jdkee on Tuesday December 17, 2019 @12:15AM
(#21810842)
No. “Well regulated” in the context of the 2A means in good working condition. The militia, which is every male between the ages of 18 and 45, shoukd have a working weapon. Legal “regulations” has nothing to do with it.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
[dead]
Re:United States to fund gun-violence research after 20-year...
by ryeights on Tuesday December 17, 2019 @02:19AM
(#21811409)
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/554/570/#tab-opi...
Ctrl-F "well-regulated"
Re:United States to fund gun-violence research after 20-year...
by anigbrowl on Tuesday December 17, 2019 @05:56PM
(#21819873)
That's not at all what the GP was saying.
Re:United States to fund gun-violence research after 20-year...
by ryeights on Wednesday December 18, 2019 @09:56AM
(#21825422)
>Finally, the adjective “well-regulated” implies nothing more than the imposition of proper discipline and training.
It's pretty close...
Re:United States to fund gun-violence research after 20-year...
by enraged_camel on Tuesday December 17, 2019 @12:20AM
(#21810878)
>>“Well regulated” in the context of the 2A means in good working condition.
This is the first time I'm hearing of this "good working condition" definition.
Re:United States to fund gun-violence research after 20-year...
by finnthehuman on Tuesday December 17, 2019 @07:43AM
(#21812910)
Definitions and case law surrounding 200 year old text aren't immediately intuitive from the layman's reading.