Re:Animal painting found in cave is 44k years old
by whatshisface on Thursday December 12, 2019 @02:54PM
(#21775661)
Just because there wasn't warfare doesn't mean there wasn't violence and blood feuds. That behavior has been seen even groups of other primates. If anything professional armies were an improvement because they laid the groundwork for a distinction between civilians and soldiers.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Animal painting found in cave is 44k years old
by asdff on Thursday December 12, 2019 @03:30PM
(#21776090)
Violence happened but was generally something to avoid in the paleolithic due to the risk. It was too costly and it wasn't until the neolithic were population sizes high enough to make that cost worth while, and grain and resource storage made a worthwhile reward. Systematic warfare didn't appear until the neolithic, that's when we begin finding mass graves of peoples slaughtered by weaponry and more depictions of warfare in art.
Re:Animal painting found in cave is 44k years old
by chrisco255 on Thursday December 12, 2019 @03:43PM
(#21776226)
The reason for the mass graves of course, is the increase in human population as a result of agriculture. It's not necessarily that as a percentage, you were less likely to be a victim of violence in the Paleolithic era.