News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Student Loans a Lot Like the Subprime Mortgage Debacle, W... by lotsofpulp on Wednesday December 11, 2019 @06:43AM (#21761579)
> Reforming higher education means cutting spending first and foremost.

This has already occurred and continues to be cut further. What also happened however, is the legislature promised lenders that taxpayers would pay for all student loans. Of course this doesn’t get accounted in cash flow, because you can just assume more people will pay back their loans than actually will.

So now you have a situation where a lender can make a loan of unlimited amount of money with no risk to the lender, a borrower who knows nothing about money but has infinite ability to borrow, and a seller (schools) that get less money from taxpayers, but now can fight for the gobs of money that the students (who know nothing) have control of spending.

Hence unnecessary stadiums, recreational centers, buildings, admin, etc.

Re:Student Loans a Lot Like the Subprime Mortgage Debacle, W... by sokoloff on Wednesday December 11, 2019 @06:57AM (#21761645)
Are private student loans backed by a federal guarantee of repayment? I didn’t think they were (and federal loans are definitely not infinite).

A student who is unable to repay their private loans before death leaves the lender without the money I think.

Re:Student Loans a Lot Like the Subprime Mortgage Debacle, W... by vonmoltke on Wednesday December 11, 2019 @08:24AM (#21762091)
Private loans are not backed by a federal guarantee, which is why they are such a small portion of the pie.
Re:Student Loans a Lot Like the Subprime Mortgage Debacle, W... by lotsofpulp on Wednesday December 11, 2019 @01:48PM (#21765491)
They were at some point, and/or offered by private companies with an "implicit" backing of the government such as Sallie Mae and whatnot.

This may have changed in the past few years.

Re:Student Loans a Lot Like the Subprime Mortgage Debacle, W... by lowercased on Wednesday December 11, 2019 @07:03AM (#21761673)
I don't think "reducing taxpayer funding" is the 'cutting spending' the parent comment meant. I think they meant actual reduction of admin, buildings, rec centers, etc.