News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The rise and fall of the PlayStation supercomputers by wmf on Sunday December 08, 2019 @01:35AM (#21734637)
The original Xbox had some contractual problems that prevented it from being cost-reduced. I don't think MS cared if they broke even since they were in it for the long haul. Everybody knows Xbox 3.11 for Workgroups was the first good Xbox anyway.
Re:The rise and fall of the PlayStation supercomputers by llampx on Sunday December 08, 2019 @05:55AM (#21735310)
Very different from the Windows Phone philosophy, then.
Re:The rise and fall of the PlayStation supercomputers by TMWNN on Monday December 09, 2019 @04:28PM (#21746805)
Not necessarily. PS2 dominated its generation; Xbox did OK, but only a company Microsoft's size could have sustained it (and even Microsoft superseded the console in four years, unusually short for that generation). Xbox 360, Microsoft's second try, was hugely successful, beating PS3 everywhere outside Japan. Had it only been as successful as Xbox was, though, Microsoft might not have tried again.

No Windows Phone iteration ever had more than a few percentage points of share. iOS and Android both clearly destroyed it in the market. Had WP seen a few years of sustained success it would still be around today, sort of like how BlackBerry the brand is still around, albeit for Android-based devices.

Re:The rise and fall of the PlayStation supercomputers by Narishma on Wednesday December 11, 2019 @05:20PM (#21767404)
The Xbox 360 only beat the PS3 in English-speaking countries. By the end of the generation the PS3 had outsold it world-wide, if only barely.