Actually the systems which will allow to target the "heat exchanger" are not that easy to build and only recently we have seen big lasers mounted on planes which can barely hit a rocket.
So it's not that easy and anyway it will be weapon technology.
Re:Space Stasis (Neal Stephenson)
by stcredzero on Thursday February 03, 2011 @10:57AM
(#2175167)
Actually the systems which will allow to target the "heat exchanger" are not that easy to build and only recently we have seen big lasers mounted on planes which can barely hit a rocket. So it's not that easy
I never said it would be trivial. There are two big differences, though. 1) The laser-launch craft wants to be hit. We can mount retro-reflectors on it, and it can transmit back helpful data. 2) The laser is going to be stationary, and the vehicle is going to be traveling on a known track.
and anyway it will be weapon technology.
This makes it much more likely that it will get funded and developed.
But that's not even the clever bit. The clever bit of Jordin's proposal is that the laser tracking/energizing system can be built modularly. You can build one prototype module that can launch one toy craft. Then you figure out how to mass produce it and build a whole bunch of these puppies that can lock onto and zap a much larger heat-exchanger carrying craft.
What you get is very cheap access to orbit without ungodly huge R&D and infrastructure costs up front.
http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8...
(In this case "ungodly huge" = price of a space elevator.)