News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:No to Chrome by rusk on Friday December 06, 2019 @09:31AM (#21722035)
“Originally” if I recall correctly, Chrome was a fork of firefox right? That is a long time ago though!
Re:No to Chrome by jm4 on Friday December 06, 2019 @09:36AM (#21722072)
Nope. It was a fork of WebKit which was a fork of KHTML, the engine powering Konqueror. KHTML was developed by the KDE team.

Edit: It was widely speculated that Apple would use gecko for Safari and a shock when they announced they would use the relatively little known KHTML engine. The decision was based on KHTML having much cleaner code. I haven't looked at the Mozilla code in many years, but it was pretty gnarly back then. Lots of old cruft from the Netscape days. In comparison, KHTML was beautiful.

Re:No to Chrome by cpeterso on Friday December 06, 2019 @12:00PM (#21723667)
Ken Kocienda's book "Creative Selection: Inside Apple's Design Process During the Golden Age of Steve Jobs" has more details about the Safari team's evaluation of Mozilla code and KHTML. Ken was engineer #2 on the Safari team.
Re:No to Chrome by rusk on Friday December 06, 2019 @11:38AM (#21723400)
I went looking into this, and it appears that I was confused. Google was a big contributor to Firefox in the early naughties, which is the period I was thinking of. Chrome didn't come out until a good while later.
Re:No to Chrome by msla on Friday December 06, 2019 @09:34AM (#21722055)
Chrome was never a fork of Firefox.

If anything, it was a fork of Konqueror.

Re:No to Chrome by microtherion on Friday December 06, 2019 @09:53AM (#21722218)
Chrome started out as a fork of Safari, or at least WebKit.
Re:No to Chrome by kienkien on Friday December 06, 2019 @11:19AM (#21723148)
Safari was never opensource
Re:No to Chrome by microtherion on Friday December 06, 2019 @02:30PM (#21725172)
Yes, but WebKit was, and "Safari" might be more widely known as a name.