News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Stress That Doesn't Pay: The Commuting Paradox (2004) [pdf] by lalaland1125 on Thursday December 05, 2019 @12:26PM (#21714173)
The time savings get cancelled out, but that's an incorrectly narrow view of things. Everyone who moved farther away concretely benefits in terms of bigger and/or cheaper accomodations. There is still a net benefit, just not in commute time.
Re:Stress That Doesn't Pay: The Commuting Paradox (2004) [pdf] by marssaxman on Thursday December 05, 2019 @12:53PM (#21714458)
> Everyone who moved farther away concretely benefits in terms of bigger and/or cheaper accomodations.

The rest of us suffer, in terms of increased environmental impact and ongoing infrastructure maintenance cost. We should not subsidize this behavior.

Re:Stress That Doesn't Pay: The Commuting Paradox (2004) [pdf] by lalaland1125 on Thursday December 05, 2019 @03:01PM (#21715886)
Nope, even the people who don't move benefit from reduced housing costs as people moving away frees up space.
Re:Stress That Doesn't Pay: The Commuting Paradox (2004) [pdf] by magduf on Friday December 06, 2019 @11:24AM (#21723213)
Wrong. If you want more space, you need to build more densely. All this does is drive up housing prices farther away, encouraging people to move even farther away. The whole thing is completely unsustainable.