Anyone who, after reading that list of issues and seeing the repeated sketchy behaviour of MongoDB (the company), still doesn't recognize the deep-seated issues behind how MongoDB is being developed and marketed, isn't going to be convinced by an updated list of grievances either. It'd be a waste of my time and energy.
But if you insist on evidence that they haven't actually meaningfully improved, this is their latest problem, from a few months ago: https://www.ongres.com/blog/benchmarking-do-it-with-transpar...
Seriously. My original article wasn't just a to-do list for the MongoDB developers. It was meant to illustrate the deeper problems with MongoDB, and how it's a database that was developed just to have a product to sell, not to actually build a better database.
If that message still hasn't gotten through to people, well, I've tried.
What's the point of continuing to pour engineering resources into something that doesn't actually improve upon what's already available?
We've had good experiences hosting it both with the community edition and with Atlas. When your documents make up a page tree and have a lot of structure within each document that would otherwise involve extra joins, it's a nice representation and we really haven't paid a price for using it. If we had, we might have made other choices. YMMV.
Choose boring technology - especially for a relatively simple use case such as a CMS.