Belarus’s Soviet Economy

Re:Belarus’s Soviet Economy by SamReidHughes on Monday December 02, 2019 @02:45PM (#21686060)

China's ghost cities were privately developed.

Edit: A better example for you would be Singapore, with its history of public housing, which gets privately owned (or 99-year-leased). They also have public roads.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Belarus’s Soviet Economy by EGreg on Monday December 02, 2019 @03:29PM (#21686519)

Can you please back up your assertion with sources? Here is the opposite of what you said:

Developers acquire new plots of land from local governments and are mandated to construct something more or less immediately.[10] Developers can't sit idly on vacant land and wait for the surrounding area to develop until it's economically viable.[10] This creates the quick-buck mentality in developers to rapidly build in the new area without the necessary demand for housing.[10]

"The cities are product of plan-driven economy that many cities are not expected to be complete or vibrant after 15 years of construction." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Under-occupied_developments_in...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Belarus’s Soviet Economy by SamReidHughes on Monday December 02, 2019 @03:47PM (#21686717)

You literally backed it up for me.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Belarus’s Soviet Economy by EGreg on Monday December 02, 2019 @05:07PM (#21687564)

I backed up pretty much the opposite of what you said. Massive government involvement setting the rules and mandates for developers who take the project.

[ Parent | on HN ]