Oxide Computer Company: Initial boot sequence

Re:Oxide Computer Company: Initial boot sequence by spamizbad on Monday December 02, 2019 @11:03AM (#21683595)

It starts looking appealing when your monthly AWS bill is deep into the 5 figures and you’re kinda trapped: do you pour your engineering resources into cost-optimizing your infrastructure (doable, but time consuming) or kick the can down the road?

Believe it or not, going private but not having to give up the niceties of AWS or Azure would be quite appealing.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Oxide Computer Company: Initial boot sequence by walterbell on Monday December 02, 2019 @12:52PM (#21684801)

Remember Eucalyptus? Was lead by the former CEO of MySQL. Built an open-source project that attempted to be compatible with AWS. The project is still alive.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eucalyptus_(software)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Oxide Computer Company: Initial boot sequence by ofrzeta on Monday December 02, 2019 @02:34PM (#21685955)

To say the project is still alive is a bit of an exaggeration, don't you think?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Oxide Computer Company: Initial boot sequence by walterbell on Monday December 02, 2019 @04:08PM (#21686963)

Looks like the last release was in 2017. Eight years of releases is a relatively good run. May be of interest to those like Oxide, who are considering similar paths, with the added complexity of firmware, BMCs, roots of trust and OCP-style hardware.

https://github.com/eucalyptus/eucalyptus/releases

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Oxide Computer Company: Initial boot sequence by reflectiv on Monday December 02, 2019 @12:55PM (#21684829)

Also, some companies just want their data in-house and not hosted on a remote cloud. Sometimes contracts preclude the use of 3rd party external companies to house critical data.

[ Parent | on HN ]