Re:The successor of SMS has already been hacked
by michaelt on Saturday November 30, 2019 @03:01PM
(#21671877)
E-mail doesn't have end-to-end encryption either. PGP doesn't count.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The successor of SMS has already been hacked
by stewbrew on Sunday December 01, 2019 @01:37AM
(#21674203)
Why doesn't pgp/gpg not count? Because it's too difficult to set up? Do you really trust an encryption with automatically generated, non-exchangeable keys?
That said hardly anybody I know still uses e-mail for private communication.
Re:The successor of SMS has already been hacked
by jhgaylor on Sunday December 01, 2019 @11:27AM
(#21676166)
Why doesn't PGP count?
Re:The successor of SMS has already been hacked
by zamadatix on Sunday December 01, 2019 @07:59PM
(#21679037)
Because it's PGP not email providing the encryption. Say we said PGP does count as e2ee for email, why doesn't it count for RCS? What about every protocol, I can just PGP sign messages on them so aren't they all e2ee?
Ideally when talking about e2ee it's not an optional opt in either but that's a whole different debate.
Re:The successor of SMS has already been hacked
by inetknght on Saturday November 30, 2019 @10:27PM
(#21673648)
TLS isn't end-to-end encryption?