Re:New research: Dark Energy might not exist after all
by kjeetgill on Friday November 29, 2019 @06:45AM
(#21663758)
There's an aversion to "Reddit-like" humor on HN. Especially if a post is a joke without any actual follow-up discussion.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:New research: Dark Energy might not exist after all
by ic147 on Friday November 29, 2019 @05:13PM
(#21667141)
I find it funny that a nearly identical comment (different wording, but ssame joke and no follow-up) in this thread hasn't been receiving the same negative attention.
Re:New research: Dark Energy might not exist after all
by craftinator on Friday November 29, 2019 @12:36PM
(#21665696)
Yeah, get your disgusting low-brow humor gone, foul beast! We want none of your entry level antics polluting our white collar supremacist abode!
Re:New research: Dark Energy might not exist after all
by dang on Friday November 29, 2019 @08:40PM
(#21667956)
scott_s said it best: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7609289
The issue isn't humor, it's lame humor, which is the kudzu of the internet.
https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&sor...
Re:New research: Dark Energy might not exist after all
by kjeetgill on Friday November 29, 2019 @07:38PM
(#21667712)
I think it's just more about content density. I think most feel the same way about too much meta-hn conversation. Are we on topic?
Downvotes are just saying that maybe that comment wasn't welcome in this thread not that you aren't in any thread.
It's a much cleaner downvote than those against controversial, but thought out opinions.