That's reasonable in this case, people often complain (and sometimes reasonably so) that the people in this bureaucratic entities are far removed from the "real world" and don't really understand what they're dealing with.

Too bad his credentials did not make his argument good. I bet if he actually had a good argument ... well then nobody would be complaining that his argument is bad.

If anything it makes it worse, he can't plead ignorance.

Yeah, his argument and conclusion are so bad that they're more likely to make me do a double-take on the value of his credentials.

The funny thing is that despite his credentials, he made such a spectacular blunder. It makes one wonder when the other shoe will drop for "Let's Encrypt".

Well, they already only take bug reports from people who enter into a contract with Microsoft!?

Really? I've never heard of that. Can you elaborate?

Well ... try reporting a bug without doing so and see how far you get?!